Re: Bug#1007970: ITP: cloudflare-ddns -- dynamically update a DNS record using Cloudflare
Hi Andrea,
This sounds really cool and useful to have in Debian!
Do you need a sponsor? If so, I would be willing to sponsor it.
Regards,
Stephan
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:09 PM Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it> wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> * Package name : cloudflare-ddns
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Author : Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>
> * URL : https://github.com/Tachi107/cloudflare-ddns
> * License : AGPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : dynamically update a DNS record using Cloudflare
>
> This is a little program that is really useful when you want to host something
> but your ISP only provides you a dynamic IP address. It uses Cloudflare's API
> to update a given DNS record when needed. It is a simple script, so to run it
> periodically you can configure a cron job or a systemd timer (provided
> upstream).
>
> It is written in C++, performs a low number of memory allocations, and is
> really lightweight, making it a valid choice for constrained environments.
>
> It also provides a C API, so that third party programs can embed its
> functionalities.
>
> The library portion of the project is licensed under the LGPL 3, while
> everything else is under the AGPL 3.
>
> I couldn't find any alternative in the Debian archive, and while there are some
> other open source alternatives out there they are mostly written in more
> resource-intensive languages and/or are harder to deploy for simple use cases.
> And also because I'm the one who wrote this :D
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iIoEARYIADIWIQSlw/BqXszDGx3GlQz/yQfijUdG7QUCYjYplRQcYW5kcmVhQHBh
> cHBhY29kYS5pdAAKCRD/yQfijUdG7T7cAQCTCY67bva7wnXpVjKrixLVsWeOy/cU
> orsLD1f6BauB8wD/Rbs4w72xiM46pcQLMBkd0YivhGs9hshRqKk64eTqUwg=
> =3xxd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Reply to: