Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:08:16 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] YiYR0LNFoe99obl8@xanadu.blop.info>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] YiU0iGA9ddnzyTjC@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] YiUYybMfFxOcJb7A@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] YiU0iGA9ddnzyTjC@layer-acht.org>

Hi,

On 06/03/22 at 22:24 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> So I'd rather propose to file these bugs with severity 'normal' and then wait
> and then get policy updated, and then raise the severity further.

For reference, there's a debian-policy bug about deprecating 1.0 +
dpatch/quilt: #850157 (no activity since 2018)

Lucas

Reply to:

References:
- proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
- Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
Next by Date: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
Previous by thread: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
Next by thread: Re: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread