[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)



On Monday, February 21, 2022 12:40:26 PM EST Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:40:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
> > 
> > I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
> > be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in
> > Debian.  It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere
> > more appropriately since it became its general importance.
> > 
> > Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package.
> 
> I'm sorry; I do indeed intend to bring it into pkg-rpm, and I will try
> to do that in the next couple of days. Apologies for the months of
> delay, and thanks a lot for all of your team's work!
> 
> G'luck,
> Peter

Please consider the pending rm bug for armhf [1].  I suspect this is related.

Scott K

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006139#10

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: