On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:14:40PM +0100, dude wrote: > Linus: the (GPL 2.0) intented social contract is: “i give you sourcecode, > give me back your changes” > > https://dwaves.de/2022/01/31/why-is-it-gnu-linux-and-not-just-linux-linus-talking-about-gpl-v3-vs-gpl-v2-the-better-one-the-social-gpl-contract-is-i-give-you-sourcecode-give-me-back-your-changes-non-free-binary/ > > if the developer does not want-need changes back GPL 3.0 is also "okayish" > > the kernel licensing is also rather... complicated... (with the many > different versions of GPL and LGPL) maybe a user can do a 30min entertaining > sum up video explanation of this ... This isn't related to this thread. > PS: yes iterating over this stuff takes time, anyone ever read the whole GPL > 2.0? Yes. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature