On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but
I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of
peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less
bottlenecked on a single team than the current NEW processing setup.
This is a fantastic idea.
In fact, it wouldn't have to bottleneck packages at all. I mean, if a
quality issue is found in NEW, wouldn't the same be an RC bug preventing
a transition to testing?