Re: move to merged-usr-only?
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 11:12 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 10:19 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > So let's make it so a canonical path to a file never includes a directory
> > symlink; if you insist on /usr/bin/rm then /bin/rm should be
> > /bin/{rm->/usr/bin/rm} not /{bin->usr/bin}/rm
>
> Why ship /bin/rm at all? Seems too complicated and just ends in the
> half-migrated state that SuSE was in last I checked.
Oh, and I forgot: I don't think adding new /bin/python3 ->
/usr/bin/python3 symlinks (repeat for everything else in
/usr/{bin,sbin} and possibly some parts of lib) to all packages is a
desirable goal.
One point is *not* having / to know about the contents /usr. That was
discussed many times in the past and I don't think we need to revisit
it.
Ansgar
Reply to: