Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:51:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20200819215152.GX1006@mail.wookware.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200819054723.rlvxcskagxjbeydr@gpm.stappers.nl>
References: <[🔎] 9ce0a2f4-f091-62b1-3395-13b5eb2690ad@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20200818211808.GD2403@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] 20200819054723.rlvxcskagxjbeydr@gpm.stappers.nl>

On 2020-08-19 07:47 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> 
> 
> Please, pretty please,  make  `debcheckout  <every_package>`  possible

'dgit checkout <every_package>' is possible. 

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
  - From: Alexis Murzeau <amubtdx@gmail.com>
- Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
  - From: Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
Next by Date: Re: Tagging in Salsa -> upload: status?
Previous by thread: Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?
Next by thread: we do recommend workflows (Re: Why Vcs-* fields are not at least recommended ?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread