Am 17.07.19 um 13:04 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:07:15AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >> Also, I believe the days of using a low level tool for directly configuring the >> firewall may be gone, at least for desktop use cases. It seems the industry more >> or less agreed on using firewalld [2] as a wrapper for the system firewall. >> There are plenty of system services that integrate with firewalld anyway [3]. >> By the way, firewalld is using (or should be using) nftables by default at this >> point. > > The current firewalld package in unstable depends on iptables, which > means that it does use nftables under the hood unless one fiddles with > alternatives. > > apt-file search /usr/bin/firewalld suggests that at present, two > packages (freedombox and glusterfs-common) integrate with firewalld. For > comparison, 17 packages integrate with ufw. > That list appears to be incomplete. You should also search for org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1, i.e. software using the D-Bus interface of firewalld: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature