On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 16:42, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > [1] This does *not* include the one response from a Debian downstream. > The task of being a Debian downstream is rather different and it > doesn't make sense to try to represent that in the same table. Well, it’s a bit disappointing it doesn’t since one part of the response (pristine-lfs) was not downstream-specific. -- Cheers, Andrej