Re: scratch buildds
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:34:19PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 6/15/19 12:28 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> >> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> >> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> >> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping just logs.
> >
> > Perhaps I'm missing something but would introducing more architectures
> > to the salsa.debian.org continuous integrations runners not serve
> > mostly the same purpose? The developer's workflow would simply be to
> > push a commit and it would be built and tested automatically.
> afaik the CI runners use k8s to schedule their work, so I think using
> the default CI stuff from gitlab requires an architecture supported by
> k8s. arm64 is supported and I know that some people cross-compiled k8s
> for mips(el?), but I doubt its widely supported.
>
> Am I missing something?
No, that's not the case. That is, it is *possible* to use kubernetes to
do GitLab CI, but it is in no way a requirement.
gitlab-runner has various executors to do stuff, and running something
inside docker (with or without kubernetes) is just one of the many
options.
--
To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy
-- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard
Reply to: