Re: Concern for: A humble draft policy on "deep learning v.s. freedom"
Hello guys,
On 2019-06-10 13:14, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I really like the term toxic candy.
> In two words it explains both that the model is appealing and
> problematic.
So let's keep this name :-)
> If there are subdivisions of toxic candy that we decide are free, we
> should come back and revisit and perhaps narrow toxic candy to the
> problematic cases.
Various recent comments remind me of many details, mentioned or
not mentioned, that I have overlooked. So I'm going to refactor
the whole document and make it much deeper and more complete.
This will be a big update and will take some time.
Reply to: