[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: @debian.org mail



On Jun 03, Daniel Lange <DLange@debian.org> wrote:

> > -all would stop some forged emails, but we do not have forged email
> > issues.
> We do. 4% of this year's spam in my spam traps have originated as fake
> @debian.org. Unfortunately we even nicely relay them as we can't tell
This is not a meaningful figure unless you also figure out how much of 
that spam could have been detected.

> As we are white-listed at dnswl.org and a few other places such fan out
I would be seriously surprised if dnswl.org had any significant impact 
on deliverability, and I can safely exclude that it has any for the large 
email providers.

> I know you don't like SPF mx -all but that is what stops the above and makes
> @debian.org mail delivery reliable again. As we relay mailing lists via
This is a strong assertion for which you provided no proof.

> lists.d.o (bendel) we can easily have that continue rewriting senders
> without issues. It can have a separate SPF.
I have no idea of what you are actually proposing here.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: