On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 00:11 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote: [...] > People do lazy execution on this problem. Now that a > related package entered my packaging radar, and I think > I'd better write a draft and shed some light on a safety > area. Then here is the first humble attempt: > > https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/deeplearning-policy > (issue tracker is enabled) [...] Thanks for this. Something I don't quite understand is the division into 3 categories. You write: > 2. A ToxicCandy Model refers to a free software licensed model, > trained from unknown or non-free dataset [...] > 3. A model is Non-free Model as long as any of the following > conditions is satisfied: (1) trained from unknown/non-free data [...] Is category 2 intended to be a subset of category 3, or am I missing some distinction? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part