On Thursday, March 15, 2018 11:51:11 PM Robert Haist wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Robert Haist <rhaist@mailbox.org> > > * Package name : libpe1 > Version : 1.0.0 > Upstream Author : Fernando Mercês > * URL : https://github.com/merces/libpe > * License : LGPLv3 > Programming Lang: C > Description : The PE library used by pev > > Currently the pev package in debian contains the pev tools and the library, > because upstream had a single integrated repo in the past. Now upstream is > divided in two repos and we have to package the library as dependency too. Is there a reason you picked libpe1 instead of libpe? Generally encoding the soname in the source package name is not a good practice. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.