On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > In this longish thread I have read one contribution where a developer > expressed that he was happy about checking his SONAME bumped package > that was erroneous and luckily ftpmaster found the problem. I'm happy that the ftp masters are doing their job in the best way they can. This includes any re-reviews of packages already in the archive, at whatever points they choose, be that when there's a new binary package from an old source package, randomly chosen packages, or targeting packages whose SHA3 ends in 42.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part