On Monday, March 05, 2018 04:46:27 PM Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 05 2018, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I'm not sure you actually read what I wrote since I wrote that I > > thought REQUIRING the revision to be bumped was a bad idea and you > > gave me a case where it made sense to do so. Nowhere in this thread > > have I ever said bumping the revision is inherently a bad idea. > > Thanks. I did read this, and wasn't trying to argue against the > position that bumping the revision is bad. But my e-mail might have > made it seem that I didn't pay enough attention to what you wrote, so > please accept my apologies for writing with insufficient care. No problem. Thanks for following up. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.