Hello, On Mon, Mar 05 2018, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Taken to it's logical end, then every VCS commit should have it's own > revision. Could you explain how this follows? I don't see it. > I think requiring a maintainer to increment the Debian revision of a > package based on things that happen outside the Debian archive is "not > a good idea'[1]. If a package is maintained in git, then re-using a version number means force-pushing a git tag, which can get quite confusing quite fast (it's worse than force-pushing a branch, IME). -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature