Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW process
Simon McVittie wrote:
> Are binary-NEW packages more likely to violate the DFSG than randomly
> chosen packages?
I can't speak to a randomly-selected package, but IME entirely new source
packages are less likely have problems IME than older ones that Just
Visiting, thus ...
> If the goal is to trigger periodic copyright/licensing
> review of already-accepted packages […]
... there is some merit the current system where (for example) a SONAME
bump of some package gets a cursory glance by a member the FTP team.
The team is already — err — arther stretched so an expectation of them
performing DFSG-checks of random packages seems a little optimistic.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Reply to: