Re: A proposal for improving transparency of the FTP NEW process
On 2018-03-03 10:22, Chris Lamb wrote:
> This is, of course, not very obvious or initiutive and improved
> transparency on this would obviously be a beneficial to all parties,
> let alone Debian at large.
Indeed. Sometimes I see interesting packages in NEW, but don't
know why they don't pass. A public place with all relevant
information, maybe comments by FTP team members, dialogue with
maintainer etc. would be helpful for the community in general.
> I solved this by making sarcasm my default mode.
I hope, that this was meant sarcastic. Wait...
Reply to: