Re: Spam targeting nnn-done@bugs.d.o
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Spam targeting nnn-done@bugs.d.o
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 13:35:05 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6EPx20Wr6JV=4+ekH3Ha2q+WMs_b+DaV+UWk=uh8sj19w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20180228175952.gjh6avk55f7rtlxm@qor.donarmstrong.com>
- References: <87y3jmckql.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <20180221183609.GA2323@coldtobi.de> <20180221185349.tz6xy2zzcg7ucjek@qor.donarmstrong.com> <20180225091848.l4jbluqtrjmfwml4@mikejones.breakpoint.cc> <20180225173228.mmpehskk5j2frg3z@qor.donarmstrong.com> <20180227140604.zu5wwspq5ssbas2k@breakpoint.cc> <20180227142907.GA19030@s.cotton.clara.co.uk> <CAKTje6HUPJ7rQvXRdUSUj76piMH9CVa-OkFbVHaZX5YcaOJj2Q@mail.gmail.com> <23190.43481.986087.590582@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20180228175952.gjh6avk55f7rtlxm@qor.donarmstrong.com>
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I suppose an alternative is to have the BTS ignore the special effect
> for -done messages which don't have a Version:, Package:, or other
> appropriate pseudoheader from a message which looks signed, a mailing
> address which is not the submitter, the package maintainer, a
> @debian.org account, or someone on the ldo whitelist with an appropriate
> error message. [This could be exploited, but it'd chop out a great deal
> of spam.]
That sounds pretty much perfect; whitelist attributes of the community.
Also add all contributors.d.o mails to this list of message attributes?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: