Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.11.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
> >
> >> In my honest opinion, rating certain content types within a package should be
> >> done along the lines of PEGI[1]. A self regulatory rating done as part of a
> >> social policy and administered by the particular packages maintainer. All
> >> subsequent questioning of rating would be done via bug reports against the
> >> particular package.
> >
> > Some rating related resources are at:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/OpenRating
> >
> >> * Rating set within debian folder - maybe rating file.
> >
> > Personally I think a debtags/screenshots style service would be better here.
>
> I agree. Using the package name for labelling feels odd.
>
+1
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>
So true
Groeten
Geert Stappers
[1] http://www.pegi.info
--
Leven en laten leven
Reply to: