Hi, On 22/11/17 08:49, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > This is about standardising the label we use for marking offensive > content, not about defining what is or isn't offensive. I'd argue that > "-offensive" suffix proposal was a technical term. Currently, as far as I can tell, sudo is build without PC_INSULTS. We should probably rename the sudo package to sudo-offensive. This option is defined in the source code as "Define to 1 to replace politically incorrect insults with less offensive ones." and so by not defining this option, the package is explicitly built to be offensive. Obviously we should allow for a transitional package here... (I'm sure there are many other examples in Debian, just highlighting that it's not just those 3 packages.) Thanks, Iain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature