[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed change of offensive packages to -offensive



On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 01:38:43AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
no, please, no.

policy should document technical terms.

whatever else we might come up to deal with the "real world" (that is
more complicated than that, eg think tibet, taiwan and china, or $foo)
should not be included in -policy.

This is about standardising the label we use for marking offensive content, not about defining what is or isn't offensive. I'd argue that
"-offensive" suffix proposal was a technical term.

--

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.


Reply to: