Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:34:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20160119193444.GA7568@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160119190415.GB18002@an3as.eu>
References: <20151226112021.GA20692@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] loom.20160118T185213-926@post.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20160119190415.GB18002@an3as.eu>

* Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, 2016-01-19, 20:04:

Just for the record: I'm currently touching all those packagesmaintained by Debian Med and not uploaded for >3 years. Some lastremainings of dh5 were removed and some other issues solved. I admitall of these "long time not uploaded" packages had some issues thatrectify a new upload. IMHO also debian/compat < 9 is another goodreason since automatic build time testing is not done if existing.

I don't know what you mean by dh5, but I'm pretty sure there was nochange regarding "automatic build time testing" in compat 9.


--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

References:
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now
Next by Date: RFA: alliance
Previous by thread: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
Next by thread: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread