Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

To: ARM <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 07:49:32 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6HqhhrbcyruH2Z0u8fR9SnHSCeb21vRvxzKAdOmW7=Jsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAEQ9gEm+nbRDUx_Me1D6OkBKW6htVM+4HMs_6G-NTudD6OrWtQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160722013605.GA854@einval.com> <[🔎] 20161207205040.07d1008522b3ce892cba9a50@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20161207155331.GC12572@einval.com> <[🔎] 20161210032218.GG3205@mail.wookware.org> <[🔎] CAEQ9gEm+nbRDUx_Me1D6OkBKW6htVM+4HMs_6G-NTudD6OrWtQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:

> Is there any way to simplify?

Remove the obsolete armel binaries where they occur and then mark the
packages as NFU on armel:

https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagesArchSpecific

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
  - From: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
- Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
- Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
  - From: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#848591: wanna-build: Only enable --deb-emulate-sbuild for non-backports builds
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Enabling bindnow by default in dpkg-buildflags?
Previous by thread: Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
Next by thread: Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread