Re: kronatools_2.7+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:00:10PM +0000, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> according to [1] it is even a word mark, so I don't think it is a good
> idea to let anything related to diagnostic software with krona in its
> name into the archive.
Thanks for your torough checking. As discussed long ago[2]
"KronaTools" may work, since the actual trademark is just "Krona". You could also use "Radiant", which was the original name (and still in SourceForge with a redirect). We avoided Radiant so our name could be trademarked, but you wouldn't have that problem I'm guessing.
It would help to hear other opinions before trying another upload to
new: What name do you think is a proper name for this project in Debian.
Any opinions?
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] https://www.dhs.gov/department-homeland-security-intellectual-property-policy
[2] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2016-August/045589.html
https://github.com/marbl/Krona/issues/16
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: