On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 00:56 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Karsten, > > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 20:05 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > Hello, > > > > bcc is a package (and executable) name that is already in use for > > another program in Debian. From https://packages.debian.org/sid/bcc: > > I'm aware of it. bcc is an already packaged binary package. It build from source package: linux86 > > For this package, I've tried to be close to what upstream has already named. > So, for Debian, only the source package name is: bcc. [...] Please don't do this. When the same name is used for a binary package and for a source package that doesn't build that binary, it tends to result in mis-assigned bugs as BTS users don't consistently specify which they mean. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular. - Adlai Stevenson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part