Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:27:43AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:04:00 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> Meyer wrote:
> > On jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2016 00:40:42 ART Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:10:00PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > > The alternative for ChaCha20 would be to adopt Cloudflare's patches,
> > > > but that sort of assumes that you are only interested in openssl 1.1 for
> > > > ChaCha20 (and not the other changes).
> > >
> > > I'm not willing to maintain such a patch.
> > I am with Kurt here. I myself didn't want to apply an untested patch to qt4
> > to add libssl1.1 support without enough time to test it (because after all
> > qt4 is dead upstream and we can only hope for the best, but not *right*
> > now).
> > We need to find another option.
> We now have the particularly fun situation where neither openssl 1.1 (due to
> #844366) nor openssl 1.0 (due to #736687) can get to unstable,
openssl 1.1 and openssl1.0 have to enter testing at the same time.
#736687 is a non-issue for the transition itself, and the release team
can force a package into testing ignoring such a bug.
> Scott K
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed