Re: More 5 november in the release schedule
Marc Haber, on Sun 13 Nov 2016 11:37:13 +0100, wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:06:33 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:
> >I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a state
> >that can be released seems to be the only way in which we can make a
> >release in a reasonable time frame. We've tried several other
> >approaches, which haven't worked. The approach of "let's freeze and
> >then try to fix things" didn't work. Let's not try it again.
>
> I do not think that it is a service to our users to release an
> incomplete distribution just for the sake of keeping a date.
As said above, it's *not* a matter of "keeping a date", but "getting
something out at all within reasonable time".
Samuel
Reply to: