On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 06:15:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Policy is currently written like a normal instruction manual. This has a > lot of real merit, but for quite some time I've thought that it may be > worth the effort to figure out how to structure it in a somewhat more > formal way, so that each requirement is clearly spelled out as a > requirement with both severity and certainty noted. It would eliminate a > lot of ambiguity that comes from trying to draft rules in free-form text. Thanks for bringing up this problem on -devel and describing it so clearly! > Of course, then I started running short on time to spend on such grand, > sweeping projects. :( of course :) do you think this is something which could be re-started at say DebConf (or probably better, DebCamp), or a dedicated debian-policy sprint? would anybody else be interested to spend time+work on this? -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature