Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:02:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On miércoles, 2 de noviembre de 2016 10:00:43 A. M. ART Bernhard Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > There might also be packages for which the changes are more
> > > involved and that can't be fixed in time for the release. If you
> > > want to stay with OpenSSL 1.0.2 you need to change your Build-Depends
> > > from libssl-dev to libssl1.0-dev.
> >
> > Almost expected, this fails where another build-dep pulls in libssl-dev,
> > i.e. adjusting build-dep for src:asterisk
>
> Today we the Qt/KDE team were hit but this same thing in the middle of our
> transition: libpq-dev pulls in libssl-dev which makes Qt5 FTBFS.
>
> *Not impliying bad faith here:* moreoever when we started the transition we
> depended upon libssl-dev so I don't know why the ssl transition got started.
> Possibly a human mistake, which is fair.
>
> It would have been much more simple if libssl1.1-dev was provided and libssl-
> dev be kept as it was.
>
> Can this be considered?
I don't think having libssl1-1-dev vs libssl1.0-dev is going to
make much differences in the end. The build conflicts will always
have to be sorted out.
Kurt
Reply to: