Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0
On 2016-11-02 11:16:18 [+0100], Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, at 23:49, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > All the filed bugs already contain a link to the porting guide.
>
> Is this https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes a migration
> guide?
> This is a very *poor* migration guide and sentences like "In other
> words,
> look at the 1.1 code and add the missing functions into your source. "
> are not
> very helpful to a person who is just a maintainer and not a full
> upstream
> developer who worked with OpenSSL before.
If you look at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
there are few bugs tagged patch and others which are forwarded +
fixed-upstream and also point to a patch.
Would this help? If you compile and the build fails you would see what
is missing and one of the patches should fall into the pattern.
If you look at the unbound patch [0] and compare it with the socat [1]
then they are not that different. And then openssh [2] but it more more
more places.
If you need help with a particular package just let us know.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=828584;filename=0001-get-it-compiled-againt-openssl-1.1.0.patch;msg=26
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=828550;filename=0001-socat-2-port-to-openssl-1.1.0.patch;msg=12
[2] https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/48
> Cheers,
Sebastian
Reply to: