Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0
Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:
Hi,
> There might also be packages for which the changes are more
> involved and that can't be fixed in time for the release. If you
> want to stay with OpenSSL 1.0.2 you need to change your Build-Depends
> from libssl-dev to libssl1.0-dev.
Almost expected, this fails where another build-dep pulls in libssl-dev,
i.e. adjusting build-dep for src:asterisk
output-version: 1.2
native-architecture: amd64
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-asterisk-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
conflict:
pkg1:
package: libssl1.0-dev
version: 1.0.2j-3
architecture: amd64
unsat-conflict: libssl-dev:amd64
pkg2:
package: libssl-dev
version: 1.1.0b-2
architecture: amd64
depchain1:
-
depchain:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-asterisk-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
depends: libssl1.0-dev:amd64
depchain2:
-
depchain:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-asterisk-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
depends: libc-client2007e-dev:amd64
-
package: libc-client2007e-dev
version: 8:2007f~dfsg-4+b1
architecture: amd64
depends: libssl-dev:amd64
Incidentally libc-client2007e-dev has an open FTBFS RC bug against
OpenSSL 1.1.0, but a patch is there. So I cannot really ask them to
downgrade to libssl1.0-dev as well.
Bernhard
Reply to: