Re: none
]] Ludovico Cavedon
> I could have ntopng include a ntop transitional package, but:
> - ntop has version 3:5.0.1, ntopng 1.2.1. I would need to bump the ntopng version to 4, and I am not very excited by that
> - there is no migration path from ntop to ntopng. All settings and data would be lost, therefore I am concerned that people would be disappointed if at point their instance of ntop is replaced with ntopng with default credentials, maybe on a different port.
>
> Should I just request the removal of ntop instead?
Given there's no migration path, I think making sure ntop's mentioned in
ntopng's description and just removing ntop would make sense.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Reply to: