On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 12:33:19PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> In the Packages files for binaries, we could eliminate a *massive*
> amount of redundancy by having a dedicated Packages file for "all", to
> avoid duplicating entries into every architecture's Packages file.
See [1]. However there is additional logic in dak that hides newer
arch:all packages if the corresponding binary has not been built yet.
(Or adds the older arch:all binary in addition?) That would no longer
be possible.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-all/Packages.gz
Interesting if you need to know which arch:all need building given
the constraint above.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature