Re: Security concerns with minified javascript code
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 02:12:43PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> This is becoming quite a stretch. At this rate, we will fail to match
> SC#2 because we ship previous versions of software and upstream is
> unlikely to accept a patch against a non-current version.
So you do not care if we (or our users) can send patches upstream in a good
way, you do not care if source is provided, and you do not care if a compiler
is in main.
Why do you care that software is in main, if you evidently do not care about
any of the rules we have for it?
Thanks,
Bas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=hkQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: