Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

To: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:37:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1434724675.3020.135.camel@dsp0698014.postes.calibre.edf.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150619225811.e20bf58d23d942eeaeb1dacd@debian.or.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20150619225811.e20bf58d23d942eeaeb1dacd@debian.or.jp>

Hi,

Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> wrote: 
         Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for Jessie and wheezy
         point release? (and why) I just looked debian-release posts and confused...
        
         - stable / oldstable
         - stable-proposed-updates / oldstable-proposed-updates
         - jessie / wheezy

The recommended distribution is the codename (jessie, wheezy). This way
there can be no confusion. 

-- 
Joss

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?
  - From: Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org>

References:
- Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?
  - From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#789288: ITP: duc -- A collection of tools for indexing, inspecting and visualizing disk usage
Next by Date: Bug#789304: ITP: libfilesys-virtual-perl -- Perl framework for a virtual filesystem
Previous by thread: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?
Next by thread: Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread