Re: Being part of a community and behaving
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:48:29PM +0000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:13AM +0100, Bj??rn Mork wrote:
> > md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > > On Nov 17, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> > >> > This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd
> > >> > maintainers did not reject that change,
> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;bug=746578
> > > Please try to be less selective in your quoting: the issue was still
> > > being discussed.
> > I see. So any systemd bug with a 'wontfix' tag is still considered open
> > for discussion? That's good to know. Thanks.
>
> Isn't any (open) bug tagged wontfix still "open for discussion"? If you've
> got new information, or a new approach that the maintainer might prefer,
> you can post it to the bug and discuss it with the maintainer...
It appears to be a misnomer then. I read 'wontfix' as "I'm not going to
to fix it as I don't see it as a bug."
Or am I confusing an open wontfix with a closed wontfix?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: