Hi, Raphael Hertzog: > > Title: Recommended layout for Git packaging repositories > DEP: 14 Thank you! > QUESTION: some people have argued to use debian/master as the latest > packaging targets sometimes sid and sometimes experimental. Should we > standardize on this? Or should we explicitly allow this as an alternative? > Personally I'd prefer `debian/master`. > About pristine-tar > ------------------ > > If the package maintainers use the pristine-tar tool to efficiently store > a byte-for-byte copy of the upstream tarballs, this should be done in the > `pristine-tar` branch. > Please discourage the use of pristine-tar. The format is fragile and can suffer from bit rot. -- -- Matthias Urlichs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature