Re: logcheck rules for systemd
Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de> writes:
> couldn't logcheck get much more clever on a systemd-enabled system?
> After all, the priorities are preserved, so everything of priority
> "info" or lower could be ignored automatically - and only warnings and
> errors considered further. Actually that's one of the reasons why I am
> looking forward to running systemd on my servers.
I think that would be good functionality for logcheck to have, but I
personally wouldn't turn it on. I really like the more comprehensive log
filtering and like seeing every log message that I don't know for certain
I don't care about.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: