Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The alternative is handwaving and ignoring the fact that your package
> repository is not a complete representation of your package as it exists in
> the archive.
What's wrong with storing the upstream tarballs themselves on a separate
branch, if you're that desperate to have them inside the same git repo as
the code?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: