Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
From: Andrew Kelley <superjoe30@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:36:24 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] CACXN+=Q+AfrTFNNjJRYpta+5FoqP514R44pmMpjiD6YWrgrPcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140815181716.GB22788@bongo.bofh.it>
References: <[🔎] 20140815141601.GA11454@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20140815181716.GB22788@bongo.bofh.it>

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:

> - shall we standardize the "pristine-tar" branch?
Shall we kill pristine-tar instead, since it is mostly a waste of space
for everybody without an md5 fetish?

Can you explain what you mean by this, for someone who is relatively new to packaging? What is the alternative to pristine-tar?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

References:
- Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)

Prev by Date: Re: Python 3.4
Next by Date: Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
Previous by thread: Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
Next by thread: Re: Standardizing the layout of git packaging repositories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread