[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

aptitude / package purged



On 2014-07-18 00:32:25 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 17 iul 14, 03:17:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2014-07-16 14:28:00 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > > I do that too. I haven't seen any official documentation saying that
> > > > this is a bad thing to do.
> > > 
> > > aptitude actively warns against it as highlighted in this thread.
> > 
> > Wrong! I purge removed packages almost all the time with aptitude,
> > and I've never seen any warning!
> 
> From aptitude(8)
> 
>        --purge-unused
>        If Aptitude::Delete-Unused is set to “true” (its default), then 
>        in addition to removing each package that is no longer required a       
>        by any installed package, aptitude will also purge them, removing 
>        their configuration files and perhaps other important data. For 
>        more information about which packages are considered to be        
>        “unused”, see the section “Managing Automatically Installed
>        Packages” in the aptitude reference manual.  THIS OPTION CAN 
>        CAUSE DATA LOSS! DO NOT USE IT UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE 
>        DOING!

I do not use this option. So, there's no way to see this warning.

> Yes, this is probably not what you understood as "actively", but this 
> thread is also not about running 'aptitude purge', but 'full-upgrade', 
> and if you change the default...

I didn't change the default. I just purged the removed packages at the
same time as the upgrade (with '_').

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


Reply to: