On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 19:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 19:49 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > > > On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 17:03 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > ... > > > > Missing information, dupe. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Andrei > > > > Hi Andrei, > > > > I don't think that missing information is enough argument to close a > > bug. > > It's also a duplicate, as Andrei mentioned. Given that #755286 exists, > having #755285 open is providing no benefit to anyone, including the > submitter. > > Regards, > > Adam Thank you Adam for this notification. I agree that #755285 is duplicate of #755286. But then the message should make it clear that it was closed because it is duplicate and not because it is missing information. It may be clear for may that "dupe" means duplicate, but this is not clear for every body especially that in French this means "stupid". Of course I'm sure Andrei doesn't mean this, but it is sometime important to be as much clear as possible in order to avoid misunderstanding. Cheers, Abou Al Montacir,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part