Re: Redefining critical bug severity
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>> I'm OK with either adding additional clarification or adopting this
>> language.
> I agree with Manoj's point about the gap between Russ's wording and
> the current one.
I guess I'm still failing to understand why that gap is important. Maybe
some stuff that would currently be critical is instead grave. I guess I
have a hard time getting that excited about that; clarity seems better.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: