Re: systemd-fsck?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/14/2014 12:07 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>, 2014-05-14, 17:30:
>
>> In fact, rescuing a system becomes way easier even without learning
>> any magic tools. For example, when bootup breaks you get dropped
>> into a rescue shell, same as before. The difference with systemd is
>> that as soon as you manage to mount that recalcitrant file system,
>> bootup just continues; you don't actually have to *do* anything to
>> trigger that.
>
> Oh, so the rescue shell disappearing in the least expected moment is
> by design?
I thought of mentioning something in that direction myself.
When I've successfully mounted a missing filesystem in a rescue
environment, I don't necessarily *want* to continue booting immediately;
I might want to check it and see if I can figure out what went wrong,
and/or make notes about what I did to get it working, or fix something
else that I know or suspect will have also gone wrong due to the same
cause and which I want to make sure is working before boot continues, or
any of a number of other things.
I would find having the system automatically continue boot just because
a filesystem got mounted to be quite surprising. At the bare minimum, I
would expect to need to terminate the rescue shell ('exit' or Ctrl-D)
before any such thing would occur. In fact, I would consider the need to
do so to be desirable.
- --
The Wanderer
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=hgUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: