Re: systemd-fsck?
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser:
> OK. But who says this is to stay? The systemd developers are
> hostile towards legacy stuff in a really intricate way. Take
> not jornal here but something else as example: they support
> running both ntpd and their own thing, to sweeten the deal
> now, but plan on dropping ntpd support later:
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/systemd/commits/335063290
>
Maybe because ntpd has a different use case, and running a time *server*
on a system with no stable network connection does not make much sense?
This way of arguing is like a hydra.
You refute one, three others pop up.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
Reply to: