Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 22:49:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140511204923.GA9310@cantor.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201405101856.31002.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] 87tx926zu4.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <[🔎] 201405101856.31002.holger@layer-acht.org>

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 06:56:24PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Having these bugs rott in a corner of the BTS almost nobody ever looks at is a 
> disservice to our users. IMO there should be 0 bugs open against 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=

If that's really desirable, I wonder if it would be possible for our
BTS to keep these bugs assigned to the "last maintainer" the package
had in its lifetime. That would be better than "unknown" in most cases.

Reply to:

References:
- Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
- ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Re: systemd-fsck?
Next by Date: Re: systemd-fsck?
Previous by thread: Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)
Next by thread: Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread