Re: systemd-fsck?
Am Sonntag, 11. Mai 2014, 09:13:09 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 16:27:00 +0200, Bas Wijnen <wijnen@debian.org>
>
> wrote:
> >This is the part you should _NEVER_ do. It is YOUR responsibitiliy, as a
> >maintainer (you are the maintainer, right?), to make sure that a bug that
> >is reported in the wrong place gets sent to the right place. It is GOOD
> >that a user reports it (it is a real bug), and it isn't a problem if
> >technically it isn't in your package; you just fix that.
> >
> >These sort of responses are giving you a bad name. If you'd leave that
> >statement out, the mail would be helpful. With it, the user will feel that
> >you tell them to "go away" (which was complained about in this very
> >thread).
> +1
>
> Don't discourage people from reporting bugs, even if they do so at the
> wrong place.
Honestly I did not have an idea about what the right place would be.
And added to that: I even don´t have one now.
I admit I lack full understanding of what is doing what in this scenario.
Yet the su manpage clearly states that su doesn´t open a new login session. So
if it does, its a bug in su´s behaviour. This directly contradicts Steve´s
argument.
I´d still would use start-stop-daemon in dirmngr init script. Yet, as I
outlined in my other mails, this does not fix all of the issue.
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Reply to: