Re: systemd-fsck?
On Sat, 10 May 2014 15:28:34 +0200, Martin Steigerwald
<Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
>I did not make a technical statement about systemd. I understand the reasons
>why Tech-CTTE chose it and while I am skeptical about the attitude of some
>upstream and Debian developers regarding handling bug reports and feedback, I
>am not generally opposed to it. I test drove it for some months some time ago,
>before hibernation was broken when it is in use, and mostly enjoyed the test
>drive.
>
>So please don´t use my feedback for any general anti systemd agenda. I am not
>opposed to it. But it for it to be default certain criteria are not yet met.
>In my eyes partly still open grave bugs and partly the handling or not
>handling of them. I wish that systemd upstream developers and Debian packagers
>adopt the "never break userspace" mantra of the kernel developers as "never
>break applications and application oriented services and if you do take bug
>reports seriously". Cause for me systemd is a system component. Yes, it lives
>in otherspace, but it is so lowlevel that for me it is part of the system
>which provides services to application (just like the kernel does).
+1 I could not have said that any better. Thanks Martin.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: